By Jack Fisher, DMD, and Jay Burton, DMD, MBA
As the use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) has become more prevalent, novel approaches to space closure have become more prevalent as well. With new approaches come new benefits and new complications. Unfortunately, a lot of orthodontic literature focuses on the success that comes with using TSADs, but minimizes or simply does not mention complications associated with their use.
One area where TSADs have been useful is space closure. This article will primarily focus on the protraction of posterior teeth using TSADs, as well as the potential complications that can arise using different methods of biomechanics.
Considerations When Closing Space
In cases that involve crowding, where four bicuspids have been extracted, many times space may still need to be closed once the lower incisors have been properly positioned. With conventional mechanics, orthodontists often use power chain to protract the posteriors to close the remaining space. This method frequently results in over-reclined lower incisors during the time the posteriors are protracted. At this point, Class II elastics are often used to reposition the lower incisors to a proper relationship, thereby “round-tripping” the incisors. When Class II elastics are overused, a clockwise rotation of the dentoalveolar complex can also occur.
Skeletal anchorage can eliminate or minimize the aforementioned complications. However, using TSADs necessitates a good understanding of biomechanics if you are to avoid potential complications. When using TSADs, either as direct or indirect anchorage, you must consider the effects a force has in all three planes of space. You consider not only the tooth or teeth being protracted, but also the other teeth in the system if you are using indirect anchorage.
From an occlusal perspective, the center of resistance for a lower molar is pretty close to the center of the crown. If a TSAD is placed at some point anterior to the molar and a protraction force is applied from the molar to the TSAD, the molar will tend to rotate around its center of resistance. The further away from the center of resistance the force is applied, the greater the resultant moment. Depending on the stiffness and shape of the archwire, a tremendous amount of friction can be created during protraction (Figure 1).
To compensate for this complication, a force can also be applied to the lingual by placing a TSAD on the lingual and applying a force to both the buccal and lingual aspects of the molar (Figures 2 and 3). This is easily accomplished with patients who have lingual tori, as this offers a great location to insert the TSAD. This approach is indicated in cases with a lot of space to be closed.
Another option is to attach power thread on the lingual and route the power thread around the mesial of the molar, then attach the power thread to the wire that is running through the buccal tube of the molar (Figure 4).
A third option (Figure 5) is to ligate the anteriors with a common tie, then place the power thread to the lingual of the premolar and attach the other end mesial to the cuspid to the archwire being used. The adverse effect from this particular technique could be the reclination of the anteriors.
A final option worth noting is a transcortical TSAD (Figure 6). This is a device that penetrates both cortical plates of the mandible. A cap is attached to the lingual aspect of the threaded portion that is extending through the lingual. You can then attach a force on both the buccal and lingual aspect.
Vectors of Force
A second complication that needs to be addressed when using TSADs is the vector of force from the TSAD to the molar as viewed from the buccal or lingual. Many companies tend to oversimplify the mechanics needed to protract the molar by illustrating the force from the TSAD directly to the molar hook.
First, the direction of force should be as horizontal as possible; second, it should pass through the center of resistance. If the vector of force has too much of a vertical component, meaning the force on the molar is applied above the center of resistance, the molar will tend to tip mesially, moving the crown forward, instead of translating the tooth. This in turn creates a considerable amount of friction in the molar tube. A solution to this complication is to place a bracket on the molar that has two tubes; one for the wire that the tooth will move on, and a second tube for a hook that extends apically so the force can be applied closer to the center of resistance, thereby translating the tooth (Figure 7).
Anchor Design and Placement
The design and placement of a TSAD have a direct effect on the amount and direction of force application. Four types of TSADs can be used for the type of mechanics we have discussed. These include the following:
1) Miniscrew pins: These screws are simple pins with threads that can be placed unicortically or bicortically. When placed bicortically, they tend to be more stable than those placed through only one cortical plate.
2) A screw with a base or a platform designed to be inserted to the point where the base is contacting the cortical bone. This design has more of a “bone plate effect,” resulting in increased stability as compared to a simple pin-type TSAD.
3) The transcortical type. This is the most stable type because it transverses both cortical plates completely.
4) Bone plates that have two to four screws holding the plate in place. The screws need to be at least 4 mm in length to yield a more stable TSAD than the screws with the platform seated on cortical bone. For protraction, bone plates can be placed either mesial or distal to the canines. More research needs to be conducted with these devices, specifically with regard to stability versus the other types of TSADs. A potential issue for patients regarding the bone plates is the additional cost of the device and the expense of placement.
The area of placement of TSADs is a common concern. The most common mistake clinicians make when placing the “pin type” and TSADs that have a base is to place them too close to the crest of the alveolus. This can result in fracture of the alveolar crest upon insertion. Also, the cortical bone becomes thinner as one moves toward the crest of the ridge, thereby potentially creating a less stable situation. TSADs should be placed approximately at the estimated level of the center of resistance of the first molar (about the level of the furcation). This will allow for horizontal force application through the center of resistance, thereby translating—instead of just tipping—the molar.
A complication that can result from placement further apically is tissue overgrowth (Figure 8). This is not necessarily a complication. Interestingly enough, we have not had a TSAD become loose after tissue overgrowth. The orthodontist needs to inform the patient of this potential complication, and the patient needs to understand that this overgrowth can result in some discomfort. In order to remove the TSAD after overgrowth, the orthodontist should use a laser to excise the overgrowth. Sutures may be used, but are rarely needed with a laser.
When you are protracting the first and second molars, the second molar should be bracketed and leveled before the protraction of the first molar is initiated. If you don’t do this, and the first molar crown tips mesially, you could create a unilateral open bite. The wire in this case should be a round stainless steel wire of sufficient stiffness to prevent the aforementioned tipping. The round wire will have less friction, which will place less stress on the TSAD and increase the rate of closure.
A final complication that can occur when you are closing spaces in the lower arch using skeletal anchorage deals with the coefficient of friction as posterior teeth move mesially on the wire. If you use a continuous archwire and ligate the anterior teeth to the archwire, the lower anterior teeth may flare during the space closure if the molar tube binds on the wire.
When you are closing space unilaterally and this happens, this coefficient of friction can create a unilateral anterior open bite (Figure 9). If the patient has a deep bite with an unacceptable amount of overjet, the friction created on the archwire by the posterior teeth moving mesially could be considered positive sequelae. If you don’t want anterior tooth movement, then do not ligate the anterior teeth during the posterior space closure and apply a protraction force on the lingual of the molar. This will help minimize the rotation and binding that can occur. Also, you could use segmental mechanics as opposed to a continuous archwire.
A Molar Protraction Appliance
I created an appliance that is very efficient in closing posterior space in the maxillary arch, particularly when unilateral space closure is indicated (eg, there is a missing maxillary first molar) is pictured in Figures 10 and 11. The appliance has bands on the first bicuspids and a transpalatal bar soldered to the bands. To make this appliance:
1) Solder a small hook to the bar approximately 4 mm from the band on the side that needs space closure.
2) Solder a buccal tube to the molar band on the buccal, then solder a tube on the palatal aspect of the same band at a level approximating the center of resistance of the molar being protracted.
3) Solder a .032 round stainless steel wire to the transpalatal bar and extend it through the tube soldered to the palatal of the molar band.
4) Solder another .032 round stainless steel wire to the buccal aspect of the bicuspid band, and extend it through the tube that you soldered to the molar band.
5) Place two TSADs anterior to the transpalatal bar and ligate them to the bar.
6) Place power chain from the hook soldered to the transpalatal bar to the round wire, extending through the tube on the palatal. Also attach the power chain to the buccal aspect in the same manner. The molar will translate, closing the space. This can be accomplished prior to bracketing the case.
To increase the speed of space closure, clinicians can perform osteoperforations around the roots of the teeth that are to be moved. The bone perforations are only drilled through the cortical bone. No flap is needed, and four holes that are 1.5 to 2 mm in diameter seems to be sufficient (Figure 12). It is not the purpose of this article to fully explain bone perforation/corticotomies; rather, we mention it because moving molars anteriorly, particularly in the lower arch, can be very time-consuming. Osteoperforations can be used to decrease the time needed to close space.
Closing spaces using TSADs has often been presented as simple and easy, with few or no side effects. There have been a number of advertisements published in journals that simply illustrate placing the device anterior to the tooth/teeth that need to be protracted, with a force placed from the skeletal anchorage device to the tooth/teeth—and the space miraculously closes without any complications. We hope this article has pointed out some of the potential complications and solutions related to space closure with TSADs.
Jack C. Fisher, DMD, has maintained a private practice since 1982. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Jay Burton, DMD, MBA, is an orthodontic resident at New York University. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.